FOR ADVERT ENQUIRIES - send a message to and you will get a reply.
Textual description of firstImageUrl

How to resolve a dispute on aragon court

How to resolve a dispute on a r a g o n court

Aragon Court is built on blockchain technology to provide an approach of handling disputes within decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs)

As the use of blockchain and smart contracts becomes more prevalent, understanding how to resolve disputes on Aragon Court is essential for participants in decentralized governance structures

        How to resolve a dispute on aragon court

Step-by-step guide of how to use the dispute resolution process on Aragon Court

  • Initiating the Dispute

To begin the resolution process on Aragon Court, the first step is to initiate a dispute. 

Disputes typically arise when there is a disagreement about the execution of a smart contract within a DAO. 

The party initiating the dispute must provide a deposit in the native token of the Aragon Court, ANJ (Aragon Network Juror) 

This deposit serves as collateral and is intended to prevent frivolous or malicious disputes.

  • Selecting Jurors

Once a dispute is initiated, a panel of jurors needs to be selected. 

Jurors play a crucial role in reviewing evidence and making decisions based on the merits of the case. 

Jurors are selected randomly from a pool of participants who have staked ANJ tokens to become eligible. 

The selection process ensures a decentralized and impartial decision-making mechanism.

  • Presenting Evidence

The parties involved in the dispute have the opportunity to present their evidence to the selected jurors. 

This evidence may include details about the smart contract execution, relevant transactions, or any other information pertinent to the case. 

Clear and comprehensive evidence is essential to facilitate a fair and informed decision.

  • Juror Deliberation

Jurors review the presented evidence and deliberate on the case. 

The decentralized nature of Aragon Court ensures that jurors come from diverse backgrounds, reducing the likelihood of bias. 

Jurors are economically incentivized to make fair and informed decisions, as their reputation and stake in the system are at stake.

  • Decision and Execution

After careful deliberation, the jurors collectively reach a decision. 

If the majority of jurors agree on a resolution, the decision is executed automatically through smart contracts. 

This decision is binding and enforces the outcome of the dispute. 

The losing party may face penalties or lose their deposit, further discouraging frivolous disputes.

  • Appeal Process

To maintain fairness, Aragon Court incorporates an appeal process. 

If a party is dissatisfied with the initial decision, they can appeal to a higher court. 

This higher court involves a larger group of jurors and provides an additional layer of review. 

The appeal process is designed to correct any potential errors or biases in the initial decision.

  • Learning from the Process

Regardless of the outcome, participants in the dispute resolution process on Aragon Court can learn from the experience. 

The transparency of blockchain technology allows for a thorough examination of the case and decision-making process, fostering a culture of continuous improvement in the decentralized governance ecosystem.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Drop a comment below